H.C.S. v. Community Advocacy Project of Alaska, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Without objection from the family, the superior court appointed a corporation to be the guardian and conservator of H.L.S., an adult. Six months later, one of the ward's adult sons, H.C.S., asked the court to remove the corporation and appoint him guardian and conservator. Because H.C.S. demonstrated that cireumstances had changed since the corporation's uncontested appointment, we vacate the order denying H.C.S.'s modification petition and remand for a determination whether it would be in HL.S.'s best interests to remove CAPA and appoint H.C.S.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- S.N.E. v. R.L.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Veazey v. VeazeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Deivert v. OseiraAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- King v. KingAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Lashbrook v. LashbrookAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re the Protective Proceedings of W.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Gunter v. Kathy-O-EstatesAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Protective Proceedings of M.K.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Price v. EasthamAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Farmer v. FarmerAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.