Legal Opinion
Committee to Save the Hollywoodland Specific Plan v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 2, 2008No. B197018PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZELON, J.
Petitioners Committee to Save the Hollywoodland Specific Plan and Hollywood Heritage (collectively the Committee or petitioners) appeal judgment on their petition for peremptory writ of mandate. Petitioners sought to compel the City of Los Angeles (City) to rescind its approval of a specific plan exception for a wooden fence that a homeowner had constructed atop one of the historic granite walls of Hollywoodland. The trial court denied the petition, finding the City properly relied on an exception to the Hollywoodland Specific Plan (HSP) and a categorical exemption under the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. Main San Gabriel Basin WatermasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Davidon Homes v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Westlands Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- California Unions for Reliable Energy v. Mojave Desert Air Quality Management DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v. State Ex Rel. 14th District Agricultural Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- 218 Properties, LLC v. City of CarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Inzana v. Turlock Irrigation Dist. Bd. of Dirs., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.