Legal Opinion
Davidon Homes v. City of San Jose
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 9, 1997No. H015082PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.
The City of San Jose adopted Ordinance No. 24680, which provided for a geological study of a designated area in the foothills. A second phase of the study required invasive testing techniques, including deep borings and installation of inclinometers. The city found the project was exempt from environmental review under California Code of Regulations, title 14, section 15061, subdivision (b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.) Appellants Davidon Homes and Davidon Corporation (hereafter…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Laabs v. City of VictorvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Muzzy Ranch Co. v. Solano County Airport Land Use CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Union of Med. Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.