Legal Opinion

California Unions for Reliable Energy v. Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 2009No. E046687PublishedCited by 14 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, Acting P. J.

In 2007, the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (the District) adopted “Rule 1406.” Rule 1406 concerns the use of road paving—which reduces airborne dust—to offset increases in airborne dust as well as other forms of particulate air pollution.

The parties offer strikingly different characterizations of Rule 1406.

According to the District, Rule 1406 merely provides a “protocol” to be used in applying for, calculating, and issuing paving offsets. It does not authorize any actual road paving; hence, it cannot possibly have any environmental effects. Any…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Muzzy Ranch Co. v. Solano County Airport Land Use CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. California Ass'n of Medical Products Suppliers v. Maxwell-JollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Poet, LLC v. State Air Res. Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Friends of Oceano Dunes, Inc. v. San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Cal. Build. Ind. Assn. v. Bay Area Air Qual. Mgmt. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API