Legal Opinion

Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 4, 1972No. C.D. 4382Published

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

These protests, consolidated for trial, involve ceramic articles, wholly or in chief value of porcelain, subporcelain, and *122stoneware, commercially known as “Berl Saddles”, imported from Japan.

Customs classified the Berl saddles as industrial chemical ware, of ceramic ware. It assessed those wholly or in chief value of porcelain or subporcelain at 60 per centum ad valorem under TSUS 1 item 535.21. The Berl saddles, wholly or in chief value of stoneware, were assessed at 40 per centum ad valorem under TSUS item 535.24.

~P1n.int.iff claims that the Berl saddles assessed at 60 per…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. West Coast Glass Distributors v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Austin v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. American Feldmuehle Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API