Legal Opinion

John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 21, 1958No. C. D. 1996PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

Several models of a mechanism for automatically feeding sheets of paper into printing presses, together with a so-called press drive for another of such models, form the subject of the within controversy. This merchandise was classified upon entry as machines or parts thereof, not specially provided for, and, accordingly, was assessed with duty at the rate of 13% per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T. D. 52739.

It is claimed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schweitzer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. American Steel & Copper Plate Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Welte v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. American Feldmuehle Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Bird Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Altieri v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API