City of Paris v. Street Improvement District No. 2
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtMcHaney, J.
Appellants are the city of Paris, Arkansas, its mayor, councilmen and recorder. On February 27,1927, the city council adopted ordinance No. 228,. which provides that the city shall pay annually out of its street fund aid to each street improvement district thereafter to be formed a sum of money “amounting to one-fifth of maturing bonds and interest for any such year.” Appellee district was formed in the early part of 1928 and its commissioners issued and sold serial bonds in the sum of $143,000, maturing annually in an amount of approximately $9,000, with which they constructed four or five…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McDonnell v. Improvement District No. 145Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Bank of Commerce v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Lewis v. Forrest City Special Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
3Cited by18 opinions
- McCutchen v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Ackerman v. City of Williamsport, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County1957
- City of Paris v. Street Improvement District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1990
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.