Legal Opinion

Ackerman v. City of Williamsport

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County

Decided April 29, 1957No. 388PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Williams, P. J.,

Two Williamsport paid firemen have brought this mandamus action against the City of Williamsport and its council. They ask the court to command the Williamsport City Council to place all pension funds established for the benefit of the firemen under the direction and control of a board of managers according to the Act of June 28, 1947, P. L. 1032, as amended.

Section 1 of this Act of June 28, 1947, reads, inter alia, as follows, 53 PS §39320: .

“Firemen’s Pension Fund; Management; Annuity Contracts. — Except as hereinafter provided, cities shall provide annuity contracts or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MansonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  2. American Brake Shoe Co. v. District Lodge 9 of the International Ass'n of MachinistsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. City of Paris v. Street Improvement District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. State Ex Rel. Austin v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dombrowski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Dombrowski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API