Legal Opinion

Tyler v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Revenue

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1992No. 1:CV-91-1320PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

McCLURE, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

On October 7, 1991, plaintiff Judith S. Tyler filed this action under the Equal Pay Act 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) et seq. and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging sex discrimination. Tyler has filed a motion to amend her complaint to include requests for compensatory and punitive damages and a demand for a jury trial as authorized by Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, Pub L. No. 102-166, 105 Stat. 1071-1100 (“Act” or “1991 Act”), which was enacted on November 21, 1991.

The question of whether…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Alpo Petfoods, Inc. v. Ralston Purina CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aiken v. Bucks Ass'n for Retarded Citizens, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Lockley v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
  3. Clark v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Cohen v. AustinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API