Legal Opinion

Lockley v. Chao

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 4, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-1345PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

REVERCOMB, District Judge.

This employment discrimination case is before the Court on two motions by the defendant: (1) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment; and (2) Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Demand for Compensatory Damages and a Trial by Jury. Both motions have been fully briefed, and oral argument was heard on September 10, 1992.

Background 1

The complaint states a cause of action for racial discrimination arising out of a series of events that took place between November 1987 and May 1990. Plaintiff makes claims upon numerous alleged acts of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Holladay Property Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1996
  2. O'BRIEN v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Clark v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Cohen v. AustinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. DeFiore v. VignolaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API