Legal Opinion
Haugenoe v. Workforce Safety & Insurance
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 22, 2008No. 20070099PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Robert Haugenoe appeals from a district court judgment affirming an agency order granting Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) a subrogation interest in a legal malpractice settlement. The legal malpractice action concerned Hauge-noe’s attorney’s failure to properly prosecute a medical malpractice claim related to a physician’s aggravation of a work-related injury suffered by Haugenoe. Haugenoe asserts that N.D.C.C. § 65-01-09, the sub-rogation provision of the workforce safety and insurance law, does not grant WSI a subrogation interest in the legal malpractice…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Frazier v. New Jersey Manufacturers InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Dan Nelson Construction, Inc. v. Nodland & DicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Polucha v. LandesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- Overboe v. Farm Credit Services of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Rojas v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. WannerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Great Western Bank v. Willmar Poultry Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. WORKFORCE SAFETY & INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Von Ruden v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Wilkens v. WestbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.