Legal Opinion
Zucker v. Hirschl & Adler Galleries, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 17, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herman Cahn, J.
This is an action wherein (a) the defendant art gallery, Hirschl & Adler Galleries, Inc. and Hirschl & Adler Modern, Inc. (collectively, the Gallery), seeks recovery of moneys allegedly loaned by it to the plaintiff artist, Joseph Zucker, as well as commissions allegedly due from the plaintiff under a written agreement providing for exclusive worldwide representation of plaintiff’s artwork, and (b)' the plaintiff seeks recovery of several works of his art which he originally delivered to the Gallery on a consignment basis which the Gallery now refuses to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Meltzer v. KoenigsbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Garcia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Allstate Insurance v. LibowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Zaldin v. Concord HotelNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wesselmann v. International Images, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Khaldei v. KaspievDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Grosz v. Serge Sabarsky, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Mesbahi v. BloodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019