Garcia v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that there is no evidence “that ought reasonably to satisfy a jury that the fact[s] sought to be proved [are] established” (Blum v Fresh Grown Preserve Corp., 292 NY 241, 246).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Boomer. * Taking no part: Judge Titone.
*
Designated pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 2.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by48 opinions
- Westchester County Department of Social Services v. Robert W.R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
- D'Angelo v. ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Rochester Community Savings Bank v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Morris v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.