Legal Opinion

Garcia v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1985PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that there is no evidence “that ought reasonably to satisfy a jury that the fact[s] sought to be proved [are] established” (Blum v Fresh Grown Preserve Corp., 292 NY 241, 246).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Boomer. * Taking no part: Judge Titone.

*

Designated pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 2.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Westchester County Department of Social Services v. Robert W.R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. D'Angelo v. ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Rochester Community Savings Bank v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Morris v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API