Legal Opinion

Grosz v. Serge Sabarsky, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 2005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered February 4, 2005, which granted plaintiffs motion to enforce a stipulation and denied defendant’s cross motion to vacate an appraisal and compel arbitration, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to deny plaintiffs motion and grant defendant’s cross motion to the extent of remanding for a hearing on (1) whether the painting “Akt mit blauen Schuhen” is the same as Inventory No. UC-5-6, (2) if not, whether defendant properly compensated plaintiff when it traded UC-5-6, (3) whether blockage applies to 90 missing Grosz…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Penn Central Corp. & Consolidated Rail Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Rice v. Ritz Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Olympia & York 2 Broadway Co. v. Produce Exchange Realty TrustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Rice v. Ritz Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. In re the Estate of StravinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Khaldei v. KaspievDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Matter of Johnson Kirchner Holdings, LLC v. GalvanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Sinclair Wyoming v. InfrassureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  4. Liebowitz v. LiebowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  5. Liebowitz v. LiebowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API