Meltzer v. Koenigsberg
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The Statute of Frauds requires that an agreement be in writing if by its terms performance is “ not to be completed before the end of a lifetime ” (Personal Property Law, § 31, subd. 1). Had the Legislature intended the “ lifetime ” referred to to be the lifetime of the promisor, the party to be charged, or the lifetime of any particular person, it could easily and readily have so provided. (See 4 Ariz. Code Ann. [Official ed.], § 58-101, subd. 8; Cal. Code Civ. Pro., § 1973, subd. 6.) The language found in the statute is clear and unambiguous, and, as this court long ago declared, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCluskey v. . CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- In re the Accounting of RathscheckNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by117 opinions
- People v. GrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bender v. Jamaica HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Daniman v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Bright Homes, Inc. v. WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SteckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.