Legal Opinion
Thorndike v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 31, 2006No. 06-149TPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION OR CERTIFICATION FOR INTERLOCUTORY REVIEW
BRADEN, Judge.
On July 11, 2006, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the court’s April 28, 2006 Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction. See PI. Mot. for Recons. In the alternative, Plaintiffs seek an order certifying their preliminary injunction motion for interlocutory review. Id. at 4. For the reasons discussed herein, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration is denied. In addition, the court also has determined that interlocutory appeal is not appropriate in this…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Gerald Alan Brown, and Charles v. Darnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Vereda, Ltda. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pucciariello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- McDermott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Montagne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009