Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

McDermott v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 30, 2017No. 17-9PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pro Se Complaint; Sua Sponte Dismissal; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; RCFC 12(h)(3).

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

PATRICIA E. CAMPBELL-SMITH, Chief Judge

On January 3, 2017, plaintiffs, George Edward McDermott and his family, filed a complaint in this court appearing pro se. EOF No. 1. Plaintiffs’ complaint is styled as an “EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND PROHIBITION TO THE CLERK’S OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT D.C. AND MD[] STATE INFERIOR COURTS.” Compl. Plaintiffs filed with their complaint an application to appear in forma pauperis (IFP Application), seeking…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Gene A. Folden, Coastal Communications Associates, and Judith A. Longshore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Navajo NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bennett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  2. Brestle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  3. Hymas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  4. KemperUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Savage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API