State v. Childs
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.
Following a trial to the court, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of two counts of first-degree unlawful sexual penetration, ORS 163.411; one count of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427; and one count of using a child in a display of sexually explicit conduct, ORS 163.670. We write only to address defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in admitting, in the absence of any physical signs of abuse, a physician’s diagnosis that the victim had been sexually abused, see State v. Southard, 347 Or 127, 218 P3d 104 (2009), and reject defendant’s other assignments of error…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. SouthardOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. DaviliaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. Volynets-VasylchenkoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. BahmatovCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. ArreolaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.