Legal Opinion

State v. Childs

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 25, 2011No. 07C51844; A141225PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Following a trial to the court, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of two counts of first-degree unlawful sexual penetration, ORS 163.411; one count of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427; and one count of using a child in a display of sexually explicit conduct, ORS 163.670. We write only to address defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in admitting, in the absence of any physical signs of abuse, a physician’s diagnosis that the victim had been sexually abused, see State v. Southard, 347 Or 127, 218 P3d 104 (2009), and reject defendant’s other assignments of error…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. SouthardOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. MarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. DaviliaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Volynets-VasylchenkoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. BahmatovCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. ArreolaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API