State v. Marrington
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
This criminal case requires that we decide whether an expert’s testimony that delay in reporting is a predominant feature in a child’s disclosure of sexual abuse is scientific evidence and therefore subject to the standards for evidentiary admission established by this court in State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285, 899 P2d 663 (1995). At trial, over defendant’s objection on foundation grounds, the trial court permitted the state’s expert to testify that delay in reporting is a predominant feature in a child’s disclosure of sexual abuse. Defendant was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MilbradtOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. SouthardOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. SkillicornOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- Venalonzo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- State v. OrtizOregon Supreme Court · 2024
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.