Legal Opinion

Scott v. Forbes

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1920No. Civil No. 1766PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Pima. Samuel L. Pattee, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Pima county in habeas corpus proceedings awarding the custody of William V. Scott, a minor of the age of thirteen years, to the appellee, Georgia S. Forbes. The testimony adduced at the hearing is not before us in a legal sense. Paragraph 603, Civil Code of 1913, requires that the statement of facts, or bill of exceptions, or the transcript of the testimony as taken by the official court reporter, must be filed within sixty days after the *333entry of the judgment or order denying a motion for a new trial, etc., or within such additional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Piper v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Daze v. KetchumArizona Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Corporation Commission v. Peoples Freight Line, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Primrock v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Puterbaugh v. Gila CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Barth v. PlattArizona Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API