Legal Opinion

Duncanson v. Walton

California Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1896No. S. F. No. 67PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. W. E. Greene, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

The plaintiff and his assignors entered into separate agreements with the defendants for the purchase of certain lots of land, by which they were to pay a certain portion of the purchase price at the dates of the agreements, and other installments thereafter monthly, until the whole price should be paid, at which time the defendants were to execute a conveyance of the lands. After several monthly payments had been made, differences appear to have arisen between the defendants in regard to the land, and notices were sent to the plaintiff and to his assignors by the defendant Walton,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Winter v. KittoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Carter v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. McDonald v. Pacific Debenture Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Seals v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Wood v. WatermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API