Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Pacific Debenture Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1905No. S.F. Nos. 3166 and 3314PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. C. Cavitt, C. A. Elliott, and D. E. Alexander, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

These two cases present appeals from a judgment and from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial in the same case. No. 3166 presents the appeal from the judgment, and No. 3314 an appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial.

The complaint sets forth a cause of action in twenty-nine separate counts for money had and received. The plaintiff sues in the firstrcount for money had and received on his own account by the defendant for his use, and in the subsequent counts upon similar demands by others, assignors of the plaintiff.

It is admitted by the respondent that, by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Duncanson v. WaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Miller v. McLaglenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Hunter v. McKenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. McNeese v. McNeeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Carter v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API