Legal Opinion

Eckard Brandes, Inc. v. Riley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2003No. Nos. 00-15474, 01-17307PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge:

This run of the mill Fair Labor Standards Act case quickly became the unusual case of a claimed breach of the duty of *1085loyalty owed by employees to their employer under state law, when the employees set up a competing business. The district court recognized that employees owe a duty of loyalty under Hawaii law to refrain from competing with their employer, and the court ordered the employees, Randell A. Riley and Lee T. Kunimitsu, to disgorge their profits to the employer, Eckard Brandes, Inc. (“EBI”). We affirm because the employer’s claim represents a classic violation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. TSA International Ltd. v. Shimizu Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Clara Louie, Representative for Wayne Louie, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Higa v. MirikitaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Thompson v. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Riordan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. HTS, Inc. v. BoleyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
  4. NCMIC Finance Corporation v. ArtinoDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2009
  5. Ronald Barranco v. 3D Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API