Legal Opinion

Eckard Brandes, Inc., Counter-Claimant-Appellee v. Randell A. Riley Lee T. Kunimitsu, Counter-Defendants-Appellants, and Kamaaina Pumping, a Hawaii General Partnership, Counter-Defendant. Eckard Brandes, Inc., Counter-Claimant-Appellee v. Randell A. Riley Lee T. Kunimitsu Kamaaina Pumping, a Hawaii General Partnership, Counter-Defendants-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2003No. 01-17307Published

1Opinion of the Court

338 F.3d 1082

ECKARD BRANDES, INC., Counter-claimant-Appellee,

v.

Randell A. RILEY; Lee T. Kunimitsu, Counter-defendants-Appellants, and

Kamaaina Pumping, a Hawaii general partnership, Counter-defendant.

Eckard Brandes, Inc., Counter-claimant-Appellee,

v.

Randell A. Riley; Lee T. Kunimitsu; Kamaaina Pumping, a Hawaii general partnership, Counter-defendants-Appellants.

No. 00-15474.

No. 01-17307.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted November 5, 2002 — Honolulu, Hawaii.

Filed August 11, 2003.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Junsuke Otsuka, Law Offices of Gary Y. Shigemura,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. TSA International Ltd. v. Shimizu Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Clara Louie, Representative for Wayne Louie, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Eckard Brandes, Inc. v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API