Legal Opinion

Inger Interiors v. Peralta

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1986No. 50014PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant-customers appeal from a judgment granting the plaintiff-decorator's claim for an allegedly unpaid account balance. Contrary to the customers' contention, the trial court reasonably found that the customers had agreed to pay the challenged balance. However, undisputed evidence established that the decorator had accepted the customers' proposed settlement for this controversy. Hence, we reverse the trial court's judgment and enter final judgment dismissing the decorator's claim.

I

The trial court's small claims referee heard the evidence on the plaintiff-decorator's claim and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Scholl v. TallmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Platt v. Penetryn System, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. AFC Interiors v. DiCelloOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Warner Storage, Inc. v. Systemation, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Hearst Corp. v. Lauerer, Markin & Gibbs, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. AFC Interiors v. DiCelloOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. American Fuel Trading Company v. Virginia Solid Fuels, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API