Platt v. Penetryn System, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
A single question of law is presented to this court. Did the Court of Appeals err when it found that delivery to the creditor of the check of the ■debtor bearing the legend, “Payment in full all compensation due,” as payment of monies claimed by the •creditor to be due, but denied by the creditor, and the •cashing of such check by the creditor constituted an accord and satisfaction as a matter of law?
The plaintiff contends that upon the record in this •case an issue of fact was presented and submitted to the tria] court and that issue having been determined ■by the trial judge in favor of the…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Allen v. R.G. Industrial SupplyOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Kirk Williams Co. v. Six Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Val Decker Packing Co. v. TreonOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
- Nordling v. WHELCHEL MINES COMPANYIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Morris Skilken & Co. v. Watkins Furniture Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.