Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Cummings

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1887No. 11,881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, Santa Cruz County.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff, Mary R. Cummings, against her husband, "William N. Cummings, defendant, for a divorce from the bonds of matrimony, and for a division of the community property, etc. Morgan L. Ketchum, James L. Simpson, and the Bank of Watsonville were also made defendants.

It is averred in the complaint that, during the coverture of plaintiff and defendant Cummings, the latter acquired, by the joint efforts of plaintiff and defendant just above named, a large amount of real property in the city of Santa Cruz, of the value of sixteen thousand dollars or thereabouts,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greiner v. GreinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. Weyer v. WeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API