Johnson v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
In this action plaintiff, without asking for a divorce, sought a decree awarding her permanent support and maintenance, as provided in section 137 of the Civil Code. Upon the theory that they had, by means of a fraudulent conspiracy with her husband, acquired certain real estate alleged to be community property of the couple and thus deprived her of her interest therein, she joined as defendants with him his father and mother, Frank and Beda Johnson, and his brother, Bayard Johnson. Plaintiff obtained a judgment, from which all of the defendants appeal upon a record presented in accordance…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Van Maren v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Greiner v. GreinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Kusel v. KuselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Tibbetts v. ForeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Cummings v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jenkins v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- D'Arcy v. D'ArcyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Cohn v. CohnWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Rodieck v. RodieckCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Walker v. MansonIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.