Greiner v. Greiner
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the defendant, in the Superior Court, Yolo County. Bush, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Thornton, J.:
In this action the material averments of the complaint were all denied by the answers of the defendants, except Jacob Greiner, and some affirmative averments were made in these answers respectively, necessary to show a complete defense on the part of the defendant answering. Jacob Greiner admitted all the averments of the complaint to be true.
The cause came on for trial, when the plaintiff, as is shown by a bill of exceptions, called defendant Jacob Greiner as a witness, and he was asked by the attorney for plaintiff this question: “Are you the husband of the plaintiff?”
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Van Maren v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Lord v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Wells, Fargo & Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Rowe v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by18 opinions
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Stewart v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- In Re Estate of MoffittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Fields v. MichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.