Legal Opinion

Weyer v. Weyer

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1919No. Civ. No. 2757PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Thos. F. Graham^ Judge. Affirmed. _ The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.

The appeal is from an order denying a motion for change of place of trial. The plaintiff wife sought divorce on the ground of extreme -cruelty, and joined as a defendant her husband’s brother, alleged to he the fraudulent grantee of the husband. The brother alone moved to change the place of trial.

The plaintiff alleged the husband is the owner of a one-third interest in four promissory notes of the aggregate face value of nearly fourteen thousand dollars, secured by mortgages and deeds of trust, and in certain described lands, some of which are in Stanislaus County and some in Tuolumne…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Warner v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Singer v. SingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Kashaw v. KashawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maguire v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State v. Royal Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Callnon v. CallnonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Nichols v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API