Legal Opinion

State v. Apland

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 2015No. 20140150PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Jamie Apland appealed from a criminal judgment entered upon a conditional guilty plea to possession of controlled substances and paraphernalia. We conclude the district court properly denied Apland’s motion to suppress evidence and we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Based on information from a confidential informant, the Ward County Narcotics Task Force (“officers”) were investigating a suspect involved in selling and distributing methamphetamine. While accompanying the suspect during several drug transactions, the informant observed a Cadillac Escalade and a motorcycle with…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JamesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. State v. DamronNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. SchmalzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. EbelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. SkarsgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. NupdalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. LaverdureNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. WeinmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. OdumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API