Legal Opinion
State v. Skarsgard
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 2007No. 20060304, 20060305PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Rockwell D. Skarsgard appeals from criminal judgments entered on jury verdicts finding him guilty of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor and driving under suspension. We conclude the stop of Skarsgard’s vehicle was constitutionally permissible, the district court did not erroneously admit the results of Skarsgard’s blood-alcohol test into evidence or erroneously fail to grant his motion for a mistrial, Skarsgard’s excessive bail claim is moot, Skarsgard is not enti- tied to reversal of the convictions based on the conditions of his pretrial…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of Revere v. Massachusetts General HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Frank R. Owens v. Scott County Jail Richard D. Huff, MajorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Burrell v. Hampshire CountyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Schlosser v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. DollNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Koble v. KobleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.