State v. Weinmann
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] James Roy Weinmann, Jr. and Kayla Marie Weinmann appealed from a criminal judgment entered upon their conditional pleas of guilty to possession of methamphetamine, possession of a controlled substance (hashish), possession of a controlled substance (marijuana), possession of drug paraphernalia (methamphetamine), and possession of drug paraphernalia (marijuana). The Weinmanns pled guilty after the district court denied their motion to suppress evidence. They argue the district court erred in denying the motion when it determined probable cause was established…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. RangeloffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BoehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. BirkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. DahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ChatmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Chatman v. SaylerDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2022