Legal Opinion
State v. Chupik
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided June 15, 2011No. PD-0960-10PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWomack, J.
in which KELLER, P.J., and JOHNSON, KEASLER, COCHRAN, and ALCALA, JJ., joined.
We granted review to determine whether, in a State’s appeal from a pretrial order granting a motion to suppress evidence, the record must reflect the evidence that *145was suppressed. We hold that there is not such a requirement.
The appellee, Randall Chupik, was charged by information with driving while intoxicated. The trial court granted his pretrial motion to suppress evidence. The State appealed the trial court’s order under Article 44.01(a)(5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the Third Court of Appeals…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Helms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- United States v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- State v. MorenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- State v. MedranoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. JordanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- State of Texas v. Zermeno, Jose GuadalupeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- State v. Albert Tyrone BernardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- State v. Lisa Ann Petersen, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2015
- Edson Hedivaldo Olvera-Garza Sr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.