Legal Opinion

Bird v. Hart

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1965No. Nos. 38690 and 38691PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

In running into the vehicle ahead of her, defendant failed to stop within the assured clear distance ahead, in violation of the specific requirements of Section 4511.21, Revised Code. Unless her conduct was legally excused, such violation constituted negligence per se.

Under the authority of Spalding v. Waxler, 2 Ohio St. 2d 1, the operator of a motor vehicle has control over its brake equipment and the maintenance thereof, and he has a statutory duty to maintain the brakes in good working order at all times. Ordinary care is not sufficient to constitute compliance. Therefore, the brake…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spalding v. WaxlerOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Oechsle v. HartOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Francis v. BieberOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Stump v. PhilliansOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Transportation Corp. v. Lenox Trucking, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Kuhn v. ZabotskyOhio Supreme Court · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API