Legal Opinion

Lyondell Chemical Co. v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 25, 2009No. 401, 2008PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice.

We accepted this interlocutory appeal to consider a claim that directors failed to act in good faith in conducting the sale of their company. The Court of Chancery decided that “unexplained inaction” permits a reasonable inference that the directors may have consciously disregarded their fiduciary duties. The trial court expressed concern about the speed with which the transaction was consummated; the directors’ failure to negotiate better terms; and them failure to seek potentially superior deals. But the record establishes that the directors were disinterested and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Malpiede v. TownsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. Stone v. RitterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  3. In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1996
  4. Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  5. In Re Santa Fe Pacific Corp. Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. In Re Bank of America Corp. Securities, Derivative, & Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. RBC Capital Markets, LLC v. JervisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  3. Allen v. Encore Energy Partners, L.P.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  4. In re Morton's Restaurant Group, Inc. Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
  5. In re MFW Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API