Legal Opinion

Stone v. Ritter

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 6, 2006No. 93, 2006PublishedCited by 379 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

This is an appeal from a final judgment of the Court of Chancery dismissing a derivative complaint against fifteen present and former directors of AmSouth Bancorporation (“AmSouth”), a Delaware corporation. The plaintiffs-appellants, William and Sandra Stone, are AmSouth shareholders and filed their derivative complaint without making a pre-suit demand on AmSouth’s board of directors (the “Board”). The Court of Chancery held that the plaintiffs had failed to adequately plead that such a demand would have been futile. The Court, therefore, dismissed the derivative complaint…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  3. Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  5. In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by379 opinions

  1. Barry Belmont v. MB Investment Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. In Re Citigroup Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
  3. Wood v. BaumSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  4. Desimone v. BarrowsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
  5. American International Group, Inc. v. GreenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009

374 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API