Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Rosenbaum

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 1976No. Docket 25951PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. J. Hoehn, J.

In this case, defendant attempts to escape the effect of a stipulation entered into with plaintiff in open court.

The court approved the agreement with the understanding that the proposed judgment would be prepared by plaintiff and submitted to defendant. If the judgment conformed to the agreement, defendant was to affix his name and judgment would be entered.

Defendant refused to sign the judgment which conformed to the court stipulation. His reason was he believed plaintiff would be unable to pay the amount due under the proposed judgment.

On appeal, he also asserts that he was mistaken in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  2. City of Norton Shores v. CarrMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Pedder v. KalishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Hull v. SwarthoutMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Wagner v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Board of County Road Commissioners v. SchultzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Mich. Nat'l Bank of Detroit v. PatmonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Scholnick’s Importers-Clothiers, Inc v. LentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Kline v. KlineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Siegel v. SpinneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API