Siegel v. Spinney
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff appeals as of right from a consent judgment establishing a boundary between the properties of plaintiff and defendants and giving defendants a limited right to trim trees on the strip of land of plaintiff, ownership of which was formally in dispute.
At issue was a 25' x 15' strip of land lying between defendants’ land on the north and plaintiff’s on the south. When plaintiff purchased the property in 1966, the strip was a natural area with trees, bushes, and underbrush, serving as a separation between the properties. Defendants subsequently extended their lawn south into a portion of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mich. Nat'l Bank of Detroit v. PatmonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Meyer v. RosenbaumMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Stark v. Kent Products, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- City of Norton Shores v. CarrMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by12 opinions
- Groulx v. CarlsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Heritage Broadcasting Co. v. Wilson Communications, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Dresselhouse v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Busch v. Dyno Nobel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Michigan Bell Telephone Company v. SfatMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.