Legal Opinion
Bakers Park Mining & Milling Co. v. District Court ex rel. City & County of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided May 2, 1983No. 82SA494PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUBOFSKY, Justice.
In this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21, we issued a rule to show cause why the order of the respondent Denver district court setting a hearing on attorneys’ fees in a C.R.C.P. 120 proceeding should not be vacated. We now make the rule absolute.
Timberline Mining and Milling Company, the predecessor in interest to the petitioner Bakers Park Mining & Milling Company, executed a deed of trust in favor of Tusco, Inc. on May 8, 1980. The deed of trust described certain real property which served as security for a nonnegotiable promissory note made by Timberline payable to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gertner v. Limon National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Neikirk v. Boulder National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- PRINCEVILLE CORPORATION v. BrooksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Borcherdt v. FavorColorado Court of Appeals · 1901
- Denver Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Capitol Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re NicholsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1987
- Ragsdale Bros. Roofing, Inc. v. United Bank of Denver, N.A.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1987
- United Guaranty Residential Insurance Co. v. VanderlaanColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Federal Land Bank of Wichita v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Carpenter v. Berkeley Federal Bank & Trust FSB (In re Carpenter)District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.