Legal Opinion

PRINCEVILLE CORPORATION v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 14, 1975No. 26685PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

This is an original proceeding by petitioner Princeville Corporation (Princeville) for a writ in the nature of mandamus requiring the respondent district court to show cause why it should not authorize foreclosure by the public trustee in accordance with C.R.C.P. 120. We now discharge the rule.

Princeville holds a deed of trust secured by a promissory note executed by Meridian Properties (Meridian). The land thus encumbered comprised approximately 60 acres, platted and subdivided to permit sale of individual lots. The deed of trust contains a power of sale clause.

Meridian has sold lots to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. District Court in & for the Sixteenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. Valley Develop. at Vail v. WARDER, CTY. OF EAGLESupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Moreland v. Marwich, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Plymouth Capital Co. v. District Court of Elbert CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. Bakers Park Mining & Milling Co. v. District Court ex rel. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API