Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal presents no new question of law. Even though plaintiff may have instituted the original action within three years from the time of the accrual of his cause of action against defendant, and this action within one year from the date of judgment of non-suit in original action, the record as constituted on this appeal fails to show facts which would entitle him to maintain this action under the provisions of C. S., 415. Bradshaw v. Bank, 172 N. C., 632, 90 S. E., 789; Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 517, 112 S. E., 32; Jackson v. Harvester Co., 188 N. C., 275, 124 S. E., 334; Young v. R.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rankin v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Rankin v. . OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Bradshaw v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Southerland v. CrumpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Young v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Galligan v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Nowell v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Sheppard v. Barrus Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API