Legal Opinion

Sheppard v. Barrus Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 26, 1971No. 718SC276PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

The three-year statute of limitations (G.S. 1-52) began to run against plaintiff’s claim on 31 August 1965 when a next friend was appointed for the special purpose of instituting an action on the claim. Rowland v. Beauchamp, 253 N.C. 231, 116 S.E. 2d 720 (1960). Once the statute of limitations begins to run against an action, it continues to run. Rowland v. Beauchamp, supra. Unless saved by some statute or rule, plaintiff’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations.

The question then arises, was plaintiff’s claim saved by G.S. 1-25 (formerly C.S. 415) ? While this statute was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rowland Ex Rel. Messer v. BeauchampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Osborne v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stokes v. Southeast Hotel Properties, Ltd.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1994
  2. Smith v. Cessna Aircraft Co., Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1983
  3. Mallas v. KolakDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API