Legal Opinion

Southerland v. Crump

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClabksoN, J.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, the defendant made motions for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below overruled the motions and in this we think there was error.

The sole question involved in this appeal,is whether the cost in the second action was paid before the jn-esent action was instituted.

C. S., 415 is as follows: “If an action is commenced within the time prescribed therefor, and the plaintiff is nonsuited, or a judgment therein reversed on appeal, or is arrested, the plaintiff or, if he dies and the cause of action…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rankin v. OatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Harrington v. Commissioners of WadesboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Hampton v. . Spinning CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Harper v. . BullockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Southerland v. . CrumpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hooper v. Carr Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Dellinger v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Osborne v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Merchants & Planters National Bank of Sherman v. AppleyardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Merchants & Planters National Bank of Sherman v. AppleyardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API