Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. State Bank

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1923PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

This is a suit by the City of Portland, a municipal corporation, against the State Bank of Portland, a corporation, Frank Bramwell, Superintendent of Banks, and his deputy.

A city ordinance exists in Portland providing for the deposit of city funds in any bank in the city, with a paid-up capital stock of $25,000, on pledge of certain designated government and municipal securities. In pursuance of an application made by the defendant *269bank to the city authorities and its pledge of certain United States bonds, City of Portland Improvement bonds and Portland Harbor bonds, the city deposited with…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Williams v. BruffySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Ex parte ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of PensacolaSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  5. Morgan v. BrossOregon Supreme Court · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Wiersema State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Sneeden v. City of Marion, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  5. Covey Drive Yourself & Garage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API