Styles v. Dickey
North Dakota Supreme Court
This opinion is after rehearing had. Appeal from District Court, Pierce county; Burr, J. Action by Asa J. Styles and another, partners as Styles & Koffel, against George H. Dickey and another. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs,- defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtGoss, J.
The first question presented is on a motion to strike out the statement of the case and appellants’ abstract, because the settled statement of the case did not have embodied therein the proposed amendments thereto claimed by respondents to have been served upon appellants in time. Service of them was made by mailing on the twenty-first day after service of appellants’ proposed statement, the twentieth day falling on Sunday. Owing to the delay in the mails, they did not reach appellant’s counsel until the twenty-third day after he had served his proposed statement; and previously, on the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Aultman Taylor Co. v. . SymeNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Taylor v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- In re ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- Salter v. BurtNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- North Dakota Horse & Cattle Co. v. SerumgardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nelson v. Frank E. Best Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
- Wilson v. PolsfutNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. Amerada Petroleum CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- Fox v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Bank of Dassel v. MarchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.