Legal Opinion

State v. Amerada Petroleum Corporation

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1955No. 7468PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMSON, Judge.

This is an action to determine adverse claims to the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter (SE^ of1 SW¡4) and Lot Four (4) of Section Eighteen (18); the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NE^ of NW^)- and Lot One (1) of Section Nineteen (19), all in Township One Hundred Fifty-six (,156)j 'North, Range Ninety-five (95) West of the 5th. P,M.

The complaint is in the statutory form. It sets out that plaintiffs have an estate and interest in property, challenges the defendants to set out the claims they make to the property and asks that such claims may be found invalid.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. State ex rel. Linde v. TaylorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Vance v. BurbankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. State v. First State Bank of JudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Murphy v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1947

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Olson v. Bismarck Parks & Recreation DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Dennison v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Kaisershot v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Haag v. State Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Lang v. Bank of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API