Legal Opinion

Anaheim Co. v. Holcombe

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1967PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REDDING, J. (Pro Tempore).

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing its complaint with prejudice. The action was tried to the court without a jury.

The plaintiff in its complaint alleges two separate counts. In the first count plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $5,000 paid on account of the purchase price of real property under an earnest money agreement. In the second count recovery of the sum of $5,000 is sought based upon the common count of money had and received.

The defendants Holcombe and Mariner were real estate brokers, each engaged in his separate business in Corvallis,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gordon Creek Tree Farms, Inc. v. LayneOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Stabile v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  3. Burke MacHinery Co. v. CopenhagenOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Aldrich v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Sexton v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Phillips v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Lynch v. AndrewMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Holst v. GuynnWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Billman v. HenselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Bradford v. Alvey & SonsUtah Supreme Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API