Legal Opinion
Holst v. Guynn
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 1985No. 84-95, 84-96PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
The Holsts initially brought this action against the Guynns seeking refund of the earnest money paid by Holsts to Guynns to purchase a home after the Holsts were unable to obtain financing. The Guynns filed a counterclaim seeking damages for breach of contract. The trial court found generally for the Guynns. The Holsts bring this appeal alleging error in the trial court’s refusal to grant them the return of the earnest money. The Guynns cross-appeal alleging error inasmuch as the trial court off-set the counterclaim award to the Guynns by the profit they realized upon the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rissler & McMurry Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Hagar v. MobleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Rouse v. MunroeWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Busch Development, Inc. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Zitterkopf v. RoussalisWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Prudential Preferred Properties v. J and J Ventures, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- O'S Gold Seed Co. v. United Agri-Products Financial Services, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- International Surplus Lines Insurance v. University of Wyoming Research Corp.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1994
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. City of Green RiverDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2000
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of AmericaWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.