Legal Opinion
Huttenstine v. Mast
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided March 19, 2008No. 4:05-cv-00152PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion to Enforce the Class Action Settlement Agreement [DE-77], Defendants have filed responses, Plaintiffs have replied, and this matter is therefore ripe for ruling.
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On November 22, 2005, the Rosen Law Firm and the law firm of Wilson and Iseman, 1 on behalf of Russell Todd Hutten-stine and all other persons similarly situated, filed a proposed class action under the federal securities law against HydroFlo, Inc. (“HydroFlo”), Dennis Mast, George A. Moore, Shane Traveler,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Walton v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Chappell v. RothSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- McLamb v. T.P., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Neal v. MarroneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clean Burn Fuels, LLC v. Purdue BioEnergy, LLC (In re Clean Burn Fuels, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2013
- McKEE v. JAMESNorth Carolina Business Court · 2014
- McDonough v. TOYS" R" US, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Soelect, Inc. v. Hyundai America Technical Center, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024